(Paperback, Second Edition)

Evaluating arguments for and against the death penalty, Stephen Nathanson ultimately defends an abolitionist position. In addition to the original text, this new edition includes arguments showing how and why the death penalty is inconsistent with respect for life and a commitment to justice.

(Paperback)

'It is rare that a philosopher addresses a topic that is at once of vital interest to non-philosophers and philosophers alike.'-CONCERNED PHILOSOPHERS FOR PEACE NEWSLETTER

(Hardback)

This revised edition examines different notions of rationality, such as the means-end concept, hedonism and the "evil-avoidance" view, and then rejects them in favour of the theory that to act rationally is to act "for the best", a theory the author characterises as "critical pluralism".

(Paperback)

This revised edition examines different notions of rationality, such as the means-end concept, hedonism and the "evil-avoidance" view, and then rejects them in favour of the theory that to act rationally is to act "for the best", a theory the author characterises as "critical pluralism".