Melvilles Philosophies

(Hardback)

Available Formats

Publishing Details

Classifications

Physical Properties

Description

Melvilles Philosophies departs from a long tradition of critical assessments of Melville that dismissed his philosophical capacities as ingenious but muddled. Its contributors do not apply philosophy to Melville in order to detect just how much of it he knew or understood. To the contrary, they try to hear the philosophical arguments themselvesoften very strange and quite radicalthat Melville never stopped articulating and reformulating. What emerges is a Melville who is materialistically oriented in a radical way, a Melville who thinks about life forms not just in the context of contemporary sciences but also ontologically. Melvilles Philosophies recovers a Melville who is a thinker of great caliber, which means obliquely but dramatically reversing the way the critical tradition has characterized his ideas. Finally, as a result of the readings collected here, Melville emerges as a very relevant thinker for contemporary philosophical concerns, such as the materialist turn, climate change, and post-humanism.

Reviews

This collection does not stress Melville as philosopher or Melvilles relation to philosophers (although Paul Downes does consider Melville and Hobbes); rather it looks at the philosophy latent in Melville's creative vision. Though the contributors range from veterans (Kenneth Dauber, Colin Dayan) to more recent voices (Elisa Tamarkin, Samuel Otter) to the well-known, consummately idiosyncratic Arsic, the essays share a common dimension: the synchronic. In so many cases in which development appeared possible, a wise reflectiveness reveals repetition. In his essay, Michael Jonik says The Confidence-Man should make one remain ever wary of the advance of geniality. James Lilley argues that Amasa Delanos dancing in Benito Cereno is fragmented gestures necessarily fateful and failed. Rhian Williams reads the late Holy Land epic Clarel as figuring religiosity through repetition"; in their essays on Clarel, Arsic and Paul Hurh have different religious stances but agree that existence is naught but a continuous, processional concept" (as Arsic writes). Overall the book gives a heartening sense of movement into a world where, as Evans puts it in the opening essay, one is fully at home but never in control. Summing Up: Recommended. Lower-division undergraduates through faculty. * CHOICE *
By engaging Melvilles singular ways of thinking, the contributors to Arsic and Evans 'untimely' collection show how Melvilles writings anticipate and clarify the philosophical stakes of intellectual preoccupationsspeculative materialism, new formalism, relational aesthetics, object-oriented ontology, inoperative communities, ecocriticismwe recognize as our own. In so doing they render Melvilles Philosophies indispensable to thinking contemporaneity. * Donald E. Pease, Director of the Futures of American Studies Institute, Dartmouth College, USA, and author of The New American Exceptionalism *
Its easy to imagine that Melville would have delighted in the creative, thoughtful, and daring essays collected in Melvilles Philosophies. With a striking originality, erudition, and insight, these essays, in the spirit of their subject, deftly unmap conceptual certainties and open unanticipated wonders in Melvilles philosophical visions. With topics diverse as signs and subjectivity, empiricism and the unobservable world, doubt and impersonality, unreciprocatable love and community ethics, the immateriality of pain and feeling faith, prosthetic sovereignty and the politics of new beginnings, Melvilles Philosophies gives us an exhilaratingly re-imagined Melville and, in the process, gives us much-needed insight into contemporary questions of belief and attachment, materiality and ethics, aesthetics and sensation, and the limits of justice. * Christopher Castiglia, Distinguished Professor of English and Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, Pennsylvania State University, USA, and author of The Practices of Hope: Literary Criticism in Disenchanted Times *

Author Bio

Branka Arsic is Charles and Lynn Zhang Professor of English and Comparative Literature at Columbia University, USA. She is the author of Bird Relics, Grief and Vitalism in Thoreau (Harvard, 2015), On Leaving, A Reading in Emerson (2010), Passive Constitutions or 71/2 Times Bartleby (2007). She is co-editor (with Cary Wolfe) of The Other Emerson: New Approaches, Divergent Paths (2010) and editor of The American Impersonal (Bloomsbury Academic, 2014). K. L. Evans is Visiting Scholar in the Department of English at Cornell University, USA. Previously she was Associate Professor of Literature and Philosophy at Yeshiva University in New York City. She is the author of Whale! (2003) and One Foot in the Finite: Melville's Realism Reclaimed (forthcoming 2017).