|    Login    |    Register

Simplicius: On Aristotle Physics 3

(Paperback)


Publishing Details

Full Title:

Simplicius: On Aristotle Physics 3

Contributors:

By (Author) Peter Lautner
By (author) Simplicius
Translated by Professor J.O. Urmson

ISBN:

9781472557353

Publisher:

Bloomsbury Publishing PLC

Imprint:

Bloomsbury Academic

Publication Date:

26th March 2014

Country:

United Kingdom

Classifications

Readership:

Tertiary Education

Fiction/Non-fiction:

Non Fiction

Other Subjects:

Philosophy: metaphysics and ontology
Literary studies: fiction, novelists and prose writers
Ancient Greek and Roman philosophy
Physics

Dewey:

530

Physical Properties

Physical Format:

Paperback

Number of Pages:

240

Dimensions:

Width 156mm, Height 234mm

Weight:

299g

Description

Aristotle's Physics Book 3 covers two subjects: the definition of change and the finitude of the universe. Change enters into the very definition of nature as an internal source of change. Change receives two definitions in chapters 1 and 2, as involving the actualisation of the potential or of the changeable. Alexander of Aphrodisias is reported as thinking that the second version is designed to show that Book 3, like Book 5, means to disqualify change in relations from being genuine change. Aristotle's successor Theophrastus, we are told, and Simplicius himself, prefer to admit relational change. Chapter 3 introduces a general causal principle that the activity of the agent causing change is in the patient undergoing change, and that the causing and undergoing are to be counted as only one activity, however different in definition. Simplicius points out that this paves the way for Aristotle's God who moves the heavens, while admitting no motion in himself. It is also the basis of Aristotle's doctrine, central to Neoplatonism, that intellect is one with the objects it contemplates.In defending Aristotle's claim that the universe is spatially finite, Simplicius has to meet Archytas' question, "What happens at the edge". He replies that, given Aristotle's definition of place, there is nothing, rather than an empty place, beyond the furthest stars, and one cannot stretch one's hand into nothing, nor be prevented by nothing. But why is Aristotle's beginningless universe not temporally infinite Simplicius answers that the past years no longer exist, so one never has an infinite collection.

Author Bio

J. O. Urmson is Emeritus Professor at Stanford University and Emeritus Fellow of Corpus Christi College, Oxford. Peter Lautner is a fellow of the Research Group for Classical Studies at the Hungarian Academy of Science.

See all

Other titles from Bloomsbury Publishing PLC