The Case for Combat: How Presidents Persuade Americans to Go to War

(Hardback)

Publishing Details

Classifications

Physical Properties

Description

This book provides a historical analysis of presidential rhetoric regarding war and examines the similarities, differences, effectiveness, and ethics of the persuasive strategies used by the White House through the history of the nation. In the United States, the decision to use military force typically is made by the president, even though it is actually Congress that has the authority to commit the nation to war. It is also the president's job to inform the American people when that decision has been madeand to attempt to convince the citizens to support their government in the decision to go to war. The book traces the development of the rhetoric used by presidents to convince Americans to go to war, from the earliest days of the nation to the latest conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq. After an overview of the governmental issues related to committing to combat, the author evaluates presidential speeches over the course of ten American conflicts to determine how effectiveand ethicalpresidents have been in communicating with various publics. Taking neither a pro- nor antiwar stance, this text focuses entirely on the period leading up to the announcement of a formal conflict.

Reviews

Combining historical fact with in-depth analysis of the way leaders communicate, this well-written study of presidential rhetoric examines persuasion in the context of presidential leadership and US wars. Recommended. * Choice *

Author Bio

Edward J. Lordan, PhD, is associate professor in the Department of Communication Studies at West Chester University, PA.