|    Login    |    Register

Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface

(Paperback)


Publishing Details

Full Title:

Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface

Contributors:

By (Author) Beth Levin
By (author) Malka Rappaport Hovav

ISBN:

9780262620949

Series Number:

26

Publisher:

MIT Press Ltd

Imprint:

MIT Press

Publication Date:

7th December 1994

Country:

United States

Classifications

Readership:

Adult Education

Fiction/Non-fiction:

Non Fiction

Other Subjects:

Grammar, syntax and morphology

Dewey:

415

Physical Properties

Physical Format:

Paperback

Number of Pages:

350

Dimensions:

Width 152mm, Height 229mm, Spine 19mm

Weight:

567g

Description

This text presents an extended investigation into a set of linguistic phenomena that have received much attention over the last 15 years. Besides providing support for David Perlmutter's hypothesis that unaccusativity is syntactically represented but semantically determined, this book contributes to the development of a theory of lexical semantic representation and to the elucidation of the mapping from lexical semantics to syntax. Perlmutter's Unaccusative Hypothesis proposes that there are two classes of intransitive verbs - unergatives and unaccusatives - each associated with a distinct syntactic configuration. Unaccusativity begins by isolating the semantic factors that determine whether a verb will be unaccusative or unergative through a careful examination of the behaviour of intransitive verbs from a range of semantic classes in diverse syntactic constructions. Notable are the extensive discussions of verbs of motion, verbs of emission, and various types of verbs of change of state. The authors then introduce rules that determine the syntactic expression of the arguments of the verbs investigated and examine the interactions among them. The proper treatment of verbs that systematically show multiple meanings - and hence variable classification as unaccusative or unergative - is also considered. In the final chapter, the authors argue that the distribution of locative inversion, a purported unaccusative diagnostic, is determined instead by discourse considerations.

See all

Other titles from MIT Press Ltd