The Integrity of Criminal Process: From Theory into Practice

(Hardback)

Available Formats

Publishing Details

Classifications

Physical Properties

Description

Criminal proceedings, it is often now said, ought to be conducted with integrity. But what, exactly, does it mean for criminal process to have, or to lack, 'integrity' Is integrity in this sense merely an aspirational normative ideal, with possibly diffuse influence on conceptions of professional responsibility Or is it also a juridical concept with robust institutional purchase and enforceable practical consequences in criminal litigation The 16 new essays contained in this collection, written by prominent legal scholars and criminologists from Australia, Hong Kong, the UK and the USA, engage systematically with - and seek to generate further debate about - the theoretical and practical significance of integrity at all stages of the criminal process. Reflecting the flexibility and scope of a putative integrity principle, the essays range widely over many of the most hotly contested issues in contemporary criminal justice theory, policy and practice, including: the ethics of police investigations, charging practice and discretionary enforcement; prosecutorial independence, policy and operational decision-making; plea bargaining; the perils of witness coaching and accomplice testimony; expert evidence; doctrines of admissibility and abuse of process; lay participation in criminal adjudication; the role of remorse in criminal trials; the ethics of appellate judgment writing; innocence projects; and state compensation for miscarriages of justice.

Author Bio

Jill Hunter is Professor of Law, University of New South Wales. Paul Roberts is Professor of Criminal Jurisprudence, University of Nottingham; and Adjunct Professor of Law, University of New South Wales & CUPL, Beijing. Simon N M Young is Professor of Law, University of Hong Kong. David Dixon is Professor of Law and Dean of the Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales.