Classical Myth in Four Films of Alfred Hitchcock

(Paperback)

Available Formats

Publishing Details

Classifications

Physical Properties

Description

Classical Myth in Four Films of Alfred Hitchcock presents an original study of Alfred Hitchcock by considering how his classics-informed London upbringing marks some of his films. The Catholic and Irish-English Hitchcock (1899-1980) was born to a mercantile family and attended a Jesuit college preparatory, whose curriculum featured Latin and classical humanities. An important expression of Edwardian culture at-large was an appreciation for classical ideas, texts, images, and myth. Mark Padilla traces the ways that Hitchcocks films convey mythical themes, patterns, and symbols, though they do not overtly reference them. Hitchcock was a modernist who used myth in unconscious ways as he sought to tell effective stories in the film medium. This book treats four representative films, each from a different decade of his early career. The first two movies were produced in London: The Farmers Wife (1928) and The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934); the second two in Hollywood: Rebecca (1940) and Strangers on a Train (1951). In close readings of these movies, Padilla discusses myths and literary texts such as the Judgment of Paris, The Homeric Hymn to Demeter, Aristophaness Frogs, Apuleiuss tale Cupid and Psyche, Homers Odyssey, and The Homeric Hymn to Hermes. Additionally, many Olympian deities and heroes have archetypal resonances in the films in question. Padilla also presents a new reading of Hitchcocks circumstances as he entered film work in 1920 and theorizes why and how the films may be viewed as an expression of the classical tradition and of classical reception. This new and important contribution to the field of classical reception in the cinema will be of great value to classicists, film scholars, and general readers interested in these topics.

Reviews

One rarely finds a more exciting book on Hitchcock, or indeed on any movie director, than this one by Padilla (classical studies, Christopher Newport Univ.)... [T]he observations are detailed and perceptive. The classical themes Padilla finds are mostly from Homer and Virgil.The Farmer's Wife(1928) brings in Hestia and the judgment of Paris (and includes telling symbols: fireplace, pants, sheep, cupid);The Man Who Knew Too Much,the Eleusinian mysteries (symbols: bull, teeth, hair, seasons, eating, storms, labyrinths, metal);Rebecca,Cupid and Psyche (symbols: the sea, windows, Valhalla, pig, picnic baskets);Strangers on a Train, Hermes, Venus, Pan, and Hercules (symbols: architecture, chains, sores, Mt. Olympus, eyeglasses, shoes, lobsters, cow, calf, watches, satyrs, statues, goats, Cerberus). Provocative and demanding, the book is invaluable, and it includes hundreds of footnotes and bibliographical references. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty. * CHOICE *
Mark Padilla's study on the role of classical myth in the movies of Alfred Hitchcock is an intriguing piece of scholarly work. Strongly embedded within the ever-expanding scholarship on the reception of classical antiquity in cinema, his book sets out to explore how mythological stories, symbols, motifs and archetypal themes influenced narrative structures and character developments in Hitchcock's films over a time span of ca. 25 years (1928-1951). Through a careful selection of texts, sculptures, paintings and archaeological objects, Padilla meticulously deconstructs each of these films, and analyses how classical sources repeatedly shaped story patterns and character actions. Padilla hereby never tries to fit his reasoning into one fundamental source myth, opting instead for a more complex-and therefore more rewarding-interpretation. In the end, Padilla has produced an exceptionally learned and informative study. He ultimately succeeds in illuminating Hitchcock's eclectic and arbitrary use of classical myth in his filmmaking process, while at the same time revealing a much neglected yet crucial aspect of the director's multi-layered film language. In doing so, he makes a strong case for the universality of mythical stories, as well as their everlasting narrative power in popular culture. * The Classical Journal *
[Padilla's] work expands the terrain of classical reception studies because his analysis of Hitchcock and myth opens up the directors unacknowledged development in a classics-rich background as a new area of investigation. This book needs to be read by anyone interested in myth and film, Hitchcock, or reception studies. * Bryn Mawr Classical Review *
The several "prodigious feats" of classicist Mark Padilla in this book more than emulate those of Mr Memory in Alfred Hitchcock'sThe 39 Steps(1935).Professor Padilla's accomplishment is to have placed six Hitchcock films and their characters in something like a fundamental position in the history of art and narrative.His lens is that of Greek myth and culture, and it works splendidly.The character Richard Hannay (Robert Donat) inThe 39 Stepsis "both high and low", and we are told exactly why.Lisa Fremont (Grace Kelly) inRear Window(1954) is successively "self-centered" and "heroic", and Padilla illustrates this by analogues drawn from two separate versions of the Aphrodite/Venus story.Exemplary stuff.Whole courses on the Western-art heritage could be based on Padilla's book. -- Ken Mogg, Author of The Alfred Hitchcock Story
Aimed at a wide audience, which includes lovers of the seventh art in general but also the students of the current reception of classical authors, Classical Myth in Four Films of Alfred Hitchcock is the result of long years dedicated to the investigation of the filmography of this director, including visits to the sets of filming and to the main archives and libraries in which his legacy is conserved. * FILMHISTORIA Online *
In this welcome follow-up to hisClassical Myth in Four Films of Alfred Hitchcock,Padilla continues to demonstrate the profound influence of classical myths and imagery on many of the Master of Suspenses most important works. Classicists and scholars of film and classical receptions alike will appreciate Padillas thorough research, keen insights, and perceptive analysis, which are made accessible to lay audiences - both Hitchcock fans and armchair mythologists - through clear organization, direct prose, and full exposition of the works he discusses. By highlighting the imprint of classical myths, images, and patterns on the seemingly unrelated works of one of the most influential auteur-directors in the history of cinema, Padilla here makes an important contribution to the growing field of Reception Studies. -- Kirsten Day, Augustana College

Author Bio

Mark W. Padilla is distinguished professor of classical studies at Christopher Newport University