Feminist Explorations of Paul Ricoeur's Philosophy
By (Author) Annemie Halsema
Edited by Fernanda Henriques
Contributions by Morny Joy
Contributions by Pamela Sue Anderson
Contributions by Stephanie N. Arel
Contributions by Annlaug Bjrsns
Contributions by Scott Davidson
Contributions by Maria del Guadalupe Davidson
Contributions by Marjolaine Deschnes
Contributions by Carlos A. Garduo Comparn
Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
Lexington Books
19th May 2016
United States
Tertiary Education
Non Fiction
Feminism and feminist theory
194
Hardback
274
Width 162mm, Height 239mm, Spine 25mm
585g
This book for the first time brings together considerations upon the feminine in relation to Paul Ricurs thinking. The collection of renowned scholars who have published extensively on Ricoeur and promising younger scholars together shows the rich potential of his thought for feminist theory, without failing to critically scrutinize it and to show its limitations with respect to thinking gender differences. In the first part, Ricur, Women, and Gender, Ricurs work is taken as the starting point for the reflection upon the position of women and the feminine, and for rethinking the notion of universalism. In the second part, Ricur in Dialogue,his work is related to feminist thinkers such as Simone de Beauvoir, Judith Butler, and Nancy Fraser and to the work of artist Kara Walker. These dialogues aim at thinking through socially relevant notions such as discourse, recognition, and justice. In the third part, Ricur and Feminist Theology, Ricurian notions and ideas are the starting point for new perspectives upon feminist theology. The insights developed in this book will be of particular value to students and scholars of Ricur, feminist theory, and the limits of hermeneutics and phenomenology.
Feminist Explorations of Paul Ricoeur's Philosophy gathers contributions from both world-renowned scholars of Ricoeur's thought and leading feminist thinkers. It is a provocative and ambitious book that both locates in Ricoeur's philosophical project voices not commonly associated with his work and demonstrates their significance. Halsema and Henriques provide Ricoeur scholars and philosophy students in general with a multi-perspective view on how far the conflict of interpretations can go without losing sight of the central tenets of Ricoeur's phenomenological hermeneutics.... [I]t will certainly provide those with a philosophical background with a subtler grasp of topics and arguments the neutrality of which is often, wrongly, taken for granted. * Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy *
This book provides an implicit answer to the main dilemma of Feminist theories facing philosophical traditions. These didnt pay enough attention to discrimination of women and to inequalities; should critical approaches prevail over a close exploration of classic and contemporary texts How could we re-examine the philosophical canon from gender perspective In this book, multidisciplinary and multinational, the authors analyze Hermeneutics and, in particular, P. Ricoeurss contribution; they explore an alternative version of some practical issues, such as ethical capacities, the quest for recognition, cosmopolitanism, hospitality, and universal principles like justice. The book brings together updated interpretations of P.Ricoeurs theory and gender accounts of current and complex questions. It is organized into three sections that draw close hermeneutic Phenomenology to other philosophical voices, from S. de Beauvoir to J. Butler and N. Fraser. It also demonstrates that this dialogue or appropriation was possible and, now, it could continue. -- M.T. Lpez de la Vieja, Universidad de Salamanca
In Feminist Explorations of Paul Ricur's Philosophy, fourteen younger philosophers and feminists lead the mutually productive confrontation between Paul Ricurs hermeneutics and feminist thinking. The editors point out that though Ricur himself did not pay attention to questions pertaining to gender, the articles in this volume show that it not only makes sense to approach his philosophical thought from a feminist point of view, but also that something philosophically new results of this exploration of his thought. The result is very gratifying. What would have pleased Ricur more, he who believed when reading the philosophers of the past, in this strange form of contemporaneity, a sort of conversation with the dead yet conducted by the living -- Catherine Goldenstein, Scientific Counsil and Editorial Committee, Fonds Ricur
Even though Ricur himself never engaged a dialogue with feminist thinkers, this important collection of essays, edited by Annemie Halsema and Fernanda Henriques, demonstrates, in a very convincing way, the rich potential of his thought for feminist theory. For the first time, Ricur's hermeneutics is not only critically approached from a feminist point of view, but his thought proves to be an extraordinary laboratory for the renewal of the concepts and arguments of feminist theory. Thanks to a comparative and fruitful analysis of Ricur's critical hermeneutics and the great names of feminist thinking (Beauvoir, Fraser, Butler, etc.), the various contributors show the interest of this philosophy for feminist reflection, both in regard to the method of thinking (dialogue, conflict of interpretations, creativity of language) and in regard to the topics (the self, identity, justice, recognition, etc.) discussed by the French philosopher. -- Jean-Luc Amalric, Etudes Ricuriennes/Ricur Studies
Annemie Halsema is assistant professor in the Department of Philosophy of VU-University Amsterdam and board member of the International Association of Women Philosophers (IAPh). Fernanda Henriques is professor in the Department of Philosophy of University of vora.