Theodicy and Spirituality in the Fourth Gospel: A Girardian Perspective

(Paperback)

Publishing Details

Classifications

Physical Properties

Description

Daniel DeForest London argues that the Fourth Gospel offers a potentially transformative response to the question of suffering and the human compulsion to blame. Based on his reading of John 9 (the man born blind), London argues that the Gospel does not offer a theodicy, but rather a theodical spirituality, an experience of praying the question of suffering and remaining open to a divine response. London shows how the Johannine Jesuss response poses three sets of symbols in dichotomy (day/night, vision/blindness, sheep/wolf), each subverted by another, core symbol (light, judge, shepherd). By interpreting these symbols in light of mimetic theory, he argues that Jesuss response reveals the scapegoat mechanism in which an innocent victim is blamed by violent victimizers. However, rather than blaming the victimizers, Jesus continues to engage with the characters who appear to be villains: the light of the world transforms night and day into one continuous day; the Good Shepherd welcomes sheep and wolf into his beloved flock. In this way, readers are invited to bring to the Johannine Jesus their own violence, resentment, and wolfish rage regarding the question of suffering and to experience the theodical spirituality of the Fourth Gospel.

Reviews

In this readable and pioneering book, Daniel DeForest London offers a transformative reading of John 9 and 10. Employing the "Anthropological tale" of Ren Girard as an interpretive key to this section of John (i.e. the human propensity toward blaming and scapegoating) London shows how the Johannine Jesus transforms both victim and victimizer. The theodical spirituality emerging from his exegesis offers the promise of liberation and new life to the reader, the church and the world. This is the most important theological book I have read in the last twenty years! -- Peter Rodgers, Center for Bible Study
The problem of suffering is one of the most pastorally important issues in the Christian life, but a preacher hoping to offer a comforting word is faced with a tangled web of competing philosophical and theological explanations that finally fail to satisfy the quest for good news. In response to this challenge, London takes a deep dive into Johns story of The Man Born Blind (9:6-10:21). Respectful of the human urge to assign blame for misfortune, Londons approach instead emphasizes the evocative language of this Gospel, offering a perspective that suggests a path to spiritual transformation and an invitation to intimacy with God. -- Linda L. Clader, emerita, Church Divinity School of the Pacific
London offers a compelling reading of John 910 that challenges anti-Semitic interpretations of the gospel. Through mimetic theory, readers encounter a Johannine discourse aimed at breaking down the divide between victims and victimizer, and a Good Shepherd who invites them to deflect their need for finding blame onto the cross. Thoroughly informed by contemporary scholarship, this is a timely and significant contribution to the recovery of lament and protest prayer in the Church. -- William Morrow, Queen's University
Londons premise is that were addicted to blamesomebody must be at fault for the pain were experiencing or the fix were in!which sets in motion the tragic human cycle of scapegoating and persecuting, of violence and counterviolence. Londons Jesus wont play that game. Instead, he invites us to blame him, even kill him, as a way to open our eyes and heal our souls. This is a most beautiful and creative retelling of the Jesus story, written from the heart.



A beautiful blend of careful scholarship, biblical insight, spiritual depth and genuine humanity. -- Douglas Frank, author of A Gentler God

Author Bio

Daniel DeForest London (Ph.D in Christian spirituality, Graduate Theological Union) is the rector of Christ Episcopal Church in Eureka, California.