Available Formats
Agreeable Agreement: An Examination of the Quest for Consensus in Ecumenical Dialogue
By (Author) Dr Minna Hietamki
Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
T.& T.Clark Ltd
20th October 2011
NIPPOD
United Kingdom
Professional and Scholarly
Non Fiction
Christian Churches, denominations, groups
Theology
Ecumenism
262.0011
Paperback
272
Width 156mm, Height 234mm
406g
In recent bilateral ecumenical dialogue the aim of the dialogue has been to reach some form of doctrinal consensus. The three major chapters of the book discuss the variety of forms of doctrinal consensus found in ecumenical dialogues among Anglicans, Lutherans and Roman Catholics. In general, the dialogue documents argue for agreement/consensus based on commonality or compatibility.
Each of the three dialogue processes has specific characteristics and formulates its argument in a unique way. The Lutheran-Roman Catholic dialogue has a particular interest in hermeneutical questions and proposes various forms of "differentiated" or perspectival forms of consensus. The Anglican-Roman Catholic dialogue emphasises the correctness of interpretations. The documents consciously look towards a "common future", not the separated past.
Minna Hietamki provides a solid analysis of the ecumenical dialogues between Anglicans, Catholics and Lutherans, connecting it with the ongoing critical discussion on the value of the so-called "consensus ecumenism". While most ecumenical theologians are strong either in theological theory or ecclesial practice, Hietamki masters both fields. She defends consensus ecumenism but considers that the arguments of its critics should be taken very seriously. Her work deserves, therefore, to be read by all parties involved in current ecumenism and systematic theology.' - Risto Saarinen, University of Helsinki, Finland -- Risto Saarinen
In her remarkable first book, Faith and Order Commissioner Dr Minna Hietamki poses serious yet timely challenges to the churches and their theologians engaged in ecumenical dialogue. By her analysis of the current (and at times uncritical) uses of the word "consensus" and associated terms such as agreement, convergence, consonance, and the (con)sensus fidelium, Dr Hietamki offers profound yet realistic insights into the nature and purpose ecumenical dialogue and consensus ecumenism. As such, I consider her book to be a "prequel" to recent work on Ecumenical Reception. Her insights into the tripartite dialogues between Lutherans, Anglicans, and Roman Catholics are applicable to any bilateral dialogue, as well as to multilateral forum of Faith and Order.' - John Gibaut, Director of Faith and Order, World Council of Churches, Geneva, Switzerland -- John Gibaut
In her very informative and challenging study, Hietamki brings together for the first time on the one hand a thorough analysis of three long-time bilateral dialogues asking how they understand "consensus" or "agreement" and how they attempt to achieve them, and, on the other hand, an analysis of theoretical reflections on "consensus" in contemporary philosophy and theology. Thus she is able to raise important questions in a fresh way, to identify weaknesses and strengths, conceptual and methodological shortcomings or achievements in particular approaches. Ecumenical theology and work should take this study seriously, even if one does not agree with all of its findings.' - Theodor Dieter, Institute for Ecumenical Research, Strasbourg, France -- Theodor Dieter
Minna Hietamki received her PhD from the University of Helsinki, Finland, where she currently teaches.