In Contempt of Congress: Postwar Press Coverage on Capitol Hill

(Hardback)

Publishing Details

Classifications

Physical Properties

Description

Over the past decade, the public's opinion of Congress has declinedelection after electionto record lows. Mark J. Rozell examines the electorate's ongoing disgust with its legislature and the reasons for it. Putting recent Congresses in historical perspective, he notes that our modern representatives are actually less corrupt than those of the past, due in large measure to increased public scrutiny and ongoing tightening of ethics and conflict of interest rules. Still, the public remains skeptical, indeed hostile, toward that most representative of our national institutions. Rozell finds that much of the blame goes to highly negative press coverage of the Congress, and government in general, and that while Congress has always been a favorite target of critics and comedians, healthy skepticism has now largely been replaced by a debilitating cynicism that undermines the foundations of representative government. A major study which will be of interest to scholars and students of American politics, government, and media.

Reviews

.,."Rozell's essential argument is that, although most members of Congress are ethical and conscientious, the institution is currently held in low esteem by the public primarily because press coverage has become increasingly negative and cynical.... A worthwile endeavor with insightful observations--e.g., that because of journalists' "strong preference for activist, progressive government...coverage is most favorable in those rare occasions of policy activism and leadership during crises.""-Choice
...Rozell's essential argument is that, although most members of Congress are ethical and conscientious, the institution is currently held in low esteem by the public primarily because press coverage has become increasingly negative and cynical.... A worthwile endeavor with insightful observations--e.g., that because of journalists' "strong preference for activist, progressive government...coverage is most favorable in those rare occasions of policy activism and leadership during crises."-Choice
Rozell has uncovered one striking conclusion: the press rewards congressional activism. He correctly points out that this preference for activism is at odds with the institutional forces in Congress which promote deliberation and inaction....Rozell's study is persuasive and valuable.-Congress & The Presidency
"Rozell has uncovered one striking conclusion: the press rewards congressional activism. He correctly points out that this preference for activism is at odds with the institutional forces in Congress which promote deliberation and inaction....Rozell's study is persuasive and valuable."-Congress & The Presidency
..."Rozell's essential argument is that, although most members of Congress are ethical and conscientious, the institution is currently held in low esteem by the public primarily because press coverage has become increasingly negative and cynical.... A worthwile endeavor with insightful observations--e.g., that because of journalists' "strong preference for activist, progressive government...coverage is most favorable in those rare occasions of policy activism and leadership during crises.""-Choice

Author Bio

MARK J. ROZELL is Associate Professor of Political Science at American University and a Lecturer in the Catholic University graduate program in congressional studies./e He is the author of six books, including The Press and the Bush Presidency (Praeger, 1996).