|    Login    |    Register

Petticoats and White Feathers: Gender Conformity, Race, the Progressive Peace Movement, and the Debate Over War, 1895-1919

(Hardback)


Publishing Details

Full Title:

Petticoats and White Feathers: Gender Conformity, Race, the Progressive Peace Movement, and the Debate Over War, 1895-1919

Contributors:

By (Author) Erika Kuhlman

ISBN:

9780313303418

Publisher:

Bloomsbury Publishing PLC

Imprint:

Praeger Publishers Inc

Publication Date:

30th September 1997

Country:

United States

Classifications

Readership:

Tertiary Education

Fiction/Non-fiction:

Non Fiction

Other Subjects:

European history
First World War
Peace studies and conflict resolution
Warfare and defence
Politics and government

Dewey:

940.3162

Physical Properties

Physical Format:

Hardback

Number of Pages:

160

Description

Kuhlman explores the reasons so many antiwar progressive reformers ended up forming the most vocal faction favoring U.S. intervention in World War I. She argues that conceptualizations of gender and their relations to militarism, democracy, and citizenship were central to creating support for war. U.S. intervention in World War I occurred in an historical context of widespread anxiety about masculine identity produced by the suffrage movement and highlighted by the election of suffragist Jeannette Rankin, the only woman present in Congress during the debate over President Wilson's War Message. The progressive peace movementwhich had reached its zenith of popularity in the U.S. on the eve of interventionexperienced similar disruption as women formed their own pacifist organization. Kuhlman explores the reasons so many progressive lawmakers and pacifists ended up forming the most vocal faction in favor of war. Concepts of femininity and masculinity and their relations to militarism, democracy, and citizenship were central to creating support for war. Initially opposed to military intervention, most male progressive pacifists came to view war as an opportunity to reinvigorate the nation's sagging manhood and nationhood. Some suffragists supported war because they saw war relief work as a way to prove themselves manly enough to withstand the rigors of citizenship during war, and therefore worthy of the vote. After the U.S. declared war, however, New York City feminists' critique of militarism undermined the unity of the progressives' support for war. The New Yorkers' type of feminism, which was based on the linked oppressions of racism, class bias, and sexism, differed from other feminist arguments based on women's moral difference from men. An important study to scholars and researchers of American progressivism, pacifism, and feminism.

Reviews

Kuhlman has made a good beginning on a difficult argument. Her writing is consistently clear.-The Journal of American History
"Kuhlman has made a good beginning on a difficult argument. Her writing is consistently clear."-The Journal of American History

Author Bio

ERIKA A. KUHLMAN is Visiting Assistant Professor of History, Idaho State University. Her main area of research has been the American peace movement.

See all

Other titles from Bloomsbury Publishing PLC